You're listening to Unlimited Hangout. I'm your host Whitney
Webb. Last month, the World Health Organization quietly
announced that it would soon appoint a new chief scientist in
2023, a man named Jeremy Farrar as part of its press release on
Farrar's imminent appointment the who stated that Ferrara will
be focused on quote, bringing together the best brains in
science and in novation from around the world to develop and
deliver high quality health services to the people who need
the most no matter who they are and where they live. However,
Farrar's history in his recent role as head of the Wellcome
Trust suggests that Farrar's appointment to a top post at the
WHO bodes poorly for global health and is instead suggestive
of who ambitions to become a supranational organization that
promotes the interests of big pharma in increasingly big tech
to the detriment of public health. The announcement of
Farrar's appointment comes at an interesting time for the who, as
the organization is currently involved in secret negotiations
to amend the International Health Regulations. Those
amendments If approved by who member states would give the WHO
unprecedented power to declare a public health emergency and also
to dictate to member states what measures they must implement as
a result of that emergency. It would also establish a framework
to normalize and entrench vaccine, passports and other
biosecurity surveillance practices, while also exempting
these regulations from respecting human rights and the
fundamental freedoms of the populations of who member
states. With such unprecedented power. A man like Jeremy Farrar,
who has consistently supported on scientific biosecurity
measures throughout the COVID crisis would be able to dictate
to most of the world what public health policies must be
implemented and when adding to these issues is the recent
pandemic simulation hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for
Health Security, which previously hosted controversial
simulations, including 2000 ones dark winter, and 2019 Event 201.
This new simulation called catastrophic contagion focused
largely on Africa and on The Foos. role in shaping global and
regional pandemic responses. It of course included considerable
involvement from Bill Gates, whose foundation wields a
significant and troubling amount of influence over World Health
Organization policy. Joining me today to discuss this and more
as JohnnyVedmore.com and funkymonkey.com. He has
previously written at length about Jeremy Farrar and the
Wellcome Trust and has been a consistent critic of their
health policies, particularly as they pertain to the COVID-19
response. So welcome back to Unlimited Hangout. How's it
going, Johnny?
Yeah, it's good. I just got out of the unlimited hangout
sweatshops after writing stories, and I don't have to
close them now. And now I'm here, here for a good discussion
about someone different Jeremy Farrar.
All right. Well, without further ado, let's get in to Jeremy
Farrar. So the press release announcing Farrar's appointment
was issued on December 13 of last month, probably at a time
when a lot of people are getting ready for Christmas. I know I
didn't see it because it happened right around my
daughter's birthday. So I wasn't paying much attention. So took a
independent media a while to pick up on this. But it's very
significant. And I'm really glad you're here today, John, because
out of independent media, I don't really know of anyone
who's written more about Ferrara or the Wellcome Trust, the new.
So let's see here and how this press release describes for our,
they say for var is a clinic clinician scientist who before
joining the Wellcome Trust in 2013 spent 17 years as director
of the Clinical Research Unit at the hospital for tropical
diseases in Vietnam. They oddly omit the fact that I believe his
directorship there was funded by welcome and affiliated with the
University of Oxford, for whatever reason, and also
interesting is that they say that under Dr. Farrar the
Wellcome Trust has taken an increasingly global outlook,
focusing on funding discovery research projects to transform
the understanding of life, health and well being and
focusing on three urgent challenges those being
infectious disease, mental health, and the effects of
climate change on health. And I think some of this what they're
referring to here is a reference to welcome leap, which I wrote
about in 2021. And I'm sure we can discuss later sell Oh,
Johnny, what exactly is the WHO leaving out about Jeremy Farrar?
Why does he matter? And what is suspect to you about his
background? If anything,
what I found really interesting about Jeremy Farrar as I was
studying him, and I mean, every bit, anybody who knows my work
knows I tend to go back in history, I tend to go back
through time and try and find the root to everybody's like,
where they become famous, where they become professional, where
they become influential, where the power lies and who who gave
them that those opportunities and from very early on, Ferrara
was obviously noted as really important, and you're right
dimension, welcome and Oxford combination because it was a
1994 program being run out of Oxford by welcome joint project
that saw January for enter into becoming, we'll start off
becoming the head of the Wellcome Trust. And this was at
a time when the Wellcome Trust was really a kind of new Lee
forged entity out of the welcome PLC. And welcome, as always been
a private company and suddenly became this kind of
unaccountable, not for profit, sort of look about it on the
cover, but when you dig away underneath, it seemed like a
good way. There was a guy behind a very important man called
Richard Sykes who was the head of Glaxo and he was involved in
the merger of Glaxo SmithKline, Beecham, the Welcome, welcome
PLC, and they put the put them all together. And out of it came
the Wellcome Trust is this nonprofit entity
GlaxoSmithKline. And Beech comes as a separate company. And so
you had these, this, this new forming of the Wellcome brand.
And it's really interesting, because if you go back
beforehand, just beforehand, they're welcome, are very
involved in the HIV medication, a lot of other things
easy too. So maybe we should talk about that a little bit.
Because I think that's pretty relevant to why the Wellcome
Trust is not the medical research, nonprofit, you know,
that's objective and blah, blah, blah. I mean, it's often treated
in very glowing terms. But as you as you noted, it's an
outgrowth of what was previously welcome PLC. And before that, I
believe was Burroughs welcome. And they were the entity, the
company that produced AZT for which was an early HIV
treatment, which essentially killed people.
Yeah, they seem to be more reckless with advertising. Azt
over in America, fruit burrows, welcome, which was their
American arm, they seemed to be more reckless. And in Britain,
they were much more careful. But it was Roy Anderson, and Level
One of well, he was Wellcome Trust direct in the early 90s.
Before he joined the Wellcome Trust, he was, he was very, all
of the guys who revolve around for very shady figures. They've
got lots of different attachments to different groups
and different societies that are really, I think, important to
unraveling this massive puzzle. And it was a very small group at
the time of the early 90s. That helped form this new, you know,
because the AZT had been such bad publicity. And, of course,
it was going to be loads of court cases, fought against
welcome if it stayed in its form, that it was in at that
time. And so I think that's why it was like, rich sites come in
to dismantle it, and change what what what each of these
companies were doing. He was brought in to do that. Richard
Sykes is a very interesting man who I'll talk about later, but I
would, I would describe him as probably the man who recruited
and mentored people like Roy Anderson, Farrar, Neil Ferguson
and the famous people who are the people who will be bought
the thing, mainly on the British side. Now, a lot of Americans
when they started a lot of American press, and of course,
I'm writing for unlimited Hangout, and watching a lot of
the time what the American media are saying, and a lot of the
independent American media wants to concentrate on Fauci and
other people who are involved in the American side of the
process, but when you actually see like the BuzzFeed emails
that got released, you discover that Jeremy Farrar was above the
American the you know, Jeremy Farrar is above Have Fauci in
the chain of command. And this is really important. They don't
people don't understand why. And it's because Britain is used as
this tool. It's like a little special secret of tool the
Americans have on the side while the Americans are producing lots
of policies that will dystopian in nature, and will trap you
into medical sort of organizations and institutions
that will trap you into your nation into doing things a
certain way. Well, a lot of the actual controls don't follow the
implementation. A lot of that comes from Britain. So Richard
Sykes, the man who kind of inspired these guys were the guy
was the guy who oversaw the entire rollout of the vaccines
in the UK, when the COVID vaccines come out. Jeremy
Farrar,
I don't mean to interrupt you. But I think it might be helpful
to get into a lot of the stuff that's more recent. In a little
bit, I think it's probably good first, before we get too far
away from it, to discuss Ferraris background,
specifically, you know, the type of family he was born into, and
what his history was before he sort of teamed up with this
Wellcome Trust, and it's more, you know, it's broader network.
Yeah. What can you tell me about earlier Farrar and some of his
experience, for example, at this Vietnam hospital and things, you
know, a little bit before he joined the Wellcome Trust. Yeah,
well,
that was that was him already kind of joining the Wellcome
Trust, because in 1994, this program is being run out of
Oxford. And that's a he's just graduating from Oxford there.
He's just done his master's at Oxford, and Edward C. Holmes,
who's Of course, the man who's down for a Nobel Prize alongside
the Chinese scientists for doing the first transcription for for
right now the first transcription of Cypress Cove to
genetic sequence. He was running this program out of Oxford
welcome, Edward C. Holmes was running the program and asked
Jeremy Farrar to be part of the project along came Jeremy for
and he instantly says, you know, he was by by just I went across
to Ho Chi Minh to just do a little bit of research and I
ended up staying there 18 years. So so he flew that time. From
1994 onwards, Jeremy Farrar has been writing many papers doing a
lot of research. And if you actually read a lot of that
research, it relies on the infrastructure of information
that we have at the moment. By that I mean, PCR tests, we
understand a little bit about how cycle thresholds work and
the higher the fire cycle thresholds on a PCR test, the
more the more likely you are to get a positive or a false
positive result. Well, a lot of gemmy for hours work seems to
tests, test drugs out on high cycle thresholds. A lot of it
relies on the narratives that were created around COVID. And
he's traveled all the way around all know when he was he was born
into an really interesting family. His father had been
caught as a one of the many soldiers in France during World
War Two and had been sent to a camp a prisoner of war camp. And
he had remained in a prisoner of war camp the entire time. And he
had met his mother, you met Jeremy for his mother. When he
had got back from being released. After marching for
days and days, they finally got picked up by the British sent
back, they got sent to Scotland. And he was driven down to the
Ministry of Defence to be debriefed by his future wife, so
he would meet his wife, who was the actual driver. I mean, a lot
of women did a lot of those sorts of passes, worked in the
factory, kept home fires burning, you know, all of that
sort of stuff. And that's where they met. And it is it's an
interesting link that it comes as he goes into the Ministry of
Defense to give information about his time in captivity,
because after that, he becomes what Jeremy Farrar later calls,
like equals his family itinerant in nature. So he says that they
traveled around a lot. So they lived everywhere. Cyprus, they
lived in Libya. They lived far east. I mean, Farrar was born in
Singapore, and he is the youngest of I think there was
six children that Eric Farrar and his wife had, including
Jeremy and there's there's a lot I mean, there's a you can go
even further back in history. I'm currently looking at certain
people who may be members of his family who have identical lives
to watch me for our house, but back in Victorian pounds, so I
you know, There's the I believe that it's the family history
that's really interest based family, his father, the
traveling around, it seems very emblematic as someone who is at
least working with the state with the British in some way. I
haven't been able to find full proof of that yet. But you can
see by people like Jeremy Farrar, his direction has been
one where he's been allowed into top schools. He's progressed in
his career to levels that no one else can possibly have. And a
lot of us when we do our research into these famous and
big players is really, really important people will they all
tend to have links, family links, that are really
important. And Jeremy Farrar, when he was recruited in 1984,
he instantly went across to an area of the world where he could
do tests and experiments that he wouldn't be able to necessarily
do in the West. And that's another point that is often
missed out a lot of the time, the drugs by people like welcome
in the past, and many of the pharmaceutical companies sorry,
many of these entities, they get tested on in poor on poor Asian
Africa. Yeah. And that's where you seen, that's where you You
saw him spend a lot of his time and a lot of his papers are
written around. And some of the early I mean, when you get on to
the time when he's looking for avian flu, in the noughties.
Right,
so let's let's, let's wait there. Wait for a second,
because I wanted to sort of before you get into that, I just
wanted to mention that not only do you have this avian flu thing
that you just touched on, but as you've previously written about
Farrar, you know, that he was essentially sent by Oxford,
which is again, running the hospital that he's, you know,
ostensibly a director app, at this period of time, they're
sending him around the world and specifically study epidemics or
pandemics as they're happening in real time. Yeah, so can you
go into some of that history, including the avian flu and some
of the others?
Well, there's some really interesting, I mean, a lot of
the other people when you follow a lot of the other people too,
they have this similar, they get picked up and they get given
their place within this puzzle they get given the job and role.
So these people are selecting the highest candidates. Jeremy
Farrar is obviously seen as a very successful candidate for
the future. And what he does is study lots of lots of different
really complicated illnesses, and potential vaccines. It was
from 1996 until 2013. That Farrar is like recorded as being
the director of what's called the Oxford University Clinical
Research Unit in Ho Chi Minh City. So it's Oxford partnering,
partnering with the Wellcome Trust to set up a research
facility in Ho Chi Minh City. And there's a lot of, you know,
the actual by the time we get word gets around 2009, and bird
flu. And you've got, I mentioned like an article that was
published in a Rockefeller Rockefeller University Press
Journal of Experimental medicine in 2009. So obviously, there's
nice people keeping an eye on what January for us doing, and
it's a quote that is titled, Jeremy Farrar when disaster
strikes and Ferrara talks about the finding of a bird of a bird
flu of an avian flu. And it's a really interesting like
narrative he sets because he sets this narrative with who
people turned up the World Health Organization people and
they tested this kid and and they said, No, they don't have
SARS, or even influenza. They've just got a cold and they left.
But Jeremy Farrar is not happy with that he and professor here
we go. And they they test out girl again, and they do some
more explorations. And they discover this is a rare bird flu
and they need to start some form of epidemic response or pandemic
response to this form of influenza A, that they find in
this guy, this belief, they give this backstory, the girl found a
dead duck that she liked, and so she buried it in the garden, but
her brother decided to bury it somewhere else. And then she dug
it up again and buried it somewhere else. And that's how
she got it. And but it seemed like the experts came in did the
tests and when you actually look at what the local government
health boards say, around time, cuz this happens in somewhere in
Asia And they said, No, we don't think there was anything there.
But they convinced that really, even the who said there was
nothing there. But suddenly Jeremy Farrar finds things, you
know, he's that type of person. And then he sets a narrative.
And that narrative goes on and everybody gets behind
it right. In that particular occasion, that narrative set by
Farrar, but rejected by the who was parented extensively by the
George W. Bush administration in the United States, which
fearmonger excessively about it said millions were going to die.
And that the only if I recall, the, the countermeasure the
medical countermeasure they invested in as a result of that
fear mongering was Tamiflu, which is made by Gilead, a
pharmaceutical company that was very much tied up with still at
the time, the finances of Donald Rumsfeld, who before being
Secretary of Defense, in the Bush administration had been the
top executive at Gilead, and was still invested in that company.
And so he made like, an insane amount of money. And then of
course, it turns out that all of that fear mongering, which I
guess, in this instance seems to have started with Farrar ended
up to be inaccurate, right. And you know, it's sort of
collapsed. And no one really remembers the bird flu scares
2004 2005 anymore, except for those of us that, you know, in
the past three years, we've sort of been looking back at some of
the history like I know I did when I was looking at the Dark
Winter exercise, the anthrax and stuff, the bird flu was sort of
a subsequent attempt at that by similar actors involved with a
lot of this anthrax stuff that ended up going awry. And it's
interesting to see Farrar there, but at that time, the who was
saying was disagreeing with him. But now Farrar is set to be the
top guy, top scientist at the who, right. And it seems like
sometime between 2004 2005 When that happened, and the COVID
crisis Farrar's importance to the World Health Organization
changed a lot. And again, this is all absent from the whose
press release about Farrar doesn't mention that he had this
top role at the who, for COVID-19. Oddly enough, anyway,
you can
see you can see through Farrar's progression, though, and the way
he wrote his papers that he was very politically minded in the
world of international medical response, very politically
minded. So, I mean, 2014 and 2000 I can which one, Niall
Ferguson said that 200 million people would die and it was like
in the 1000s of people would die actually died. But these guys
use this sort of fear mongering to get more work in a sense. So
for our from 2009, he and that finding the girl with a duck and
Abigail saying she was fine. He was sent around by Oxford to
various locations. So he sent to look at the outbreak of MERS. Of
course, he's central to the Ebola outbreak in 2014. And
avian flu in 2014. To it's really interesting to see how he
became like the central figure being lifted up. I think some of
these guys are just like that they are really important to the
emblematic to the interviews are political and politically minded
and suit the prevailing narrative of people,
organizations like the who, and other health, big health
organizations who want people like this, but is it a case that
they encourage the training of people to be like this and then
promote the people to be like this? Or is it that F errara Is
this person a day that has just come out of nowhere because I
just don't believe that I really think there's a bigger history
to Jeremy Farrar and he is important, as you say, the
BuzzFeed emails, I mean, they were talking about him being
responsible for everything from financing to advising to writing
up and then they write the proximal origin of SARS cov.
He's the main guy organizing within 10 days, the production
of a paper that falsified the root of a virus that has caused
So much devastation on economies on people's lives
has since been debunked. And this was arguing that it was a
zoonotic origin.
They even wrote a second paper though they even wrote a second
paper where they were like, Oh, we were writing this one because
everybody's debunked the other one. Oh, we come to the same
conclusions again. And what's what's completely amazing about
that, is that if you actually hear what what was being said,
at the time, like what what Jeremy Farrar was and others
were doing during those periods. Now, let me let me just quote,
I've opened up a, it's a line from January Ferraro's book that
he published, or a part from January for his book that he
published during the COVID pandemic. And he says, By the
second week of January, I was beginning this January 2020, I
was beginning to realize the scale of what was happening. In
those weeks, I became exhausted and scared. I felt as if I was
living a different person's life. During that period, I
would do things I've never done before acquire a burner phone,
hello, clandestine meetings, keep difficult secrets. In the
last week of January 2020, I saw email chatter from scientists in
the US suggesting the virus looked almost engineered to
infect human cells. These were credible scientists proposing an
incredible and terrifying possibility of either accidental
leak from a laboratory or deliberate release. Now, we
already we already know that this was a release, but this
idea that that it was incredible, that oh, this is
impossible. And then they created this. He seen this
happened in January 2020. And then he created all of the hoo
ha, he created all of the fake pandemic paper. He covered it
up. And then he admitted that he covered it up in that one part
of his book. So I it seems like Jeremy Farrar thinks he's
completely untouchable. Or he's completely and utterly dumb to a
level that I can't even understand. You know, I can, I
can understand how we can see how that the idea that
clandestine methods, burner phones and all of this how that
people can't won't say, what were you doing? Why were you
being so secretive? Why were you this is a public health mapper,
but it seems like his email
so heavily redacted. Specifically, his input relative
to those of other people, just very bizarre. So thanks for
that. One thing that I wanted to talk about briefly that you
brought up is the Ebola situation, and 24, from 2014 to
2015, in West Africa. So I actually came across an article
I found very interesting when I was writing about the developers
of the AstraZeneca vaccine. Again, they're based at Oxford
University. And and I found a lot of very odd parallels of
what happened with COVID-19 vaccine rollout in the attempt
attempted vaccine rollout here in 2014. And of course, the
experimental vaccine, in the case of Ebola was
GlaxoSmithKline, which as you mentioned earlier, has a very
close relationship with the Wellcome Trust. And the Wellcome
Trust is, I believe, very much responsible for leading a
significant portion of the international response to this
Ebola crisis during this period of time. And I just want to read
some quotes here from this article that was published about
the crisis while it was ongoing by The Guardian, the UK
newspaper, and it just sounds so much like what we ended up
hearing during the COVID crisis. I mean, it's almost analogous.
So anyway, it's it reads human trials of GlaxoSmithKline
experimental vaccine, which Britain's largest
pharmaceuticals company is developing with the US NIH, are
to be fast tracked with funding from an international
consortium. Vaccines normally take 10 years to develop, but
GlaxoSmithKline said it hopes to finish the first phase of trials
by the end of 2014. For reference, this was published in
August 2014. It will start making up to 10,000 doses of the
vaccine at the same time as the initial clinical trials so that
if they prove successful SOC can be made available immediately to
the World Health Organization. And then goes on to say, if
regulatory approvals are granted the UK research teams could
start vaccinating healthy volunteers for mid September. So
this is about a month after this article is published. And in the
US, the NIH could start phase one trials which is tested on
humans. As soon as next week after receiving the green light
from the FDA. The vaccine has already shown promising results
blah, blah, blah, at 2.8 million pound grant from the Wellcome
Trust will fund safety tests by a team led by Professor Adrian
Hill, director of the Jenner Institute at the University of
Oxford with Adriene. Hill, being the man who produced along with
a Sara Gilbert, who I think is was a student at one point,
produced the Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine, which of course, has
been quite controversial taken off the market in numerous
countries, and has been listed as the cause of death on several
death certificates in the UK alone. And he previously spoke
at the Galton Institute, his mentor was a member of the
Eagleton Institute, which until 1989, was the British eugenics
society. And he's a hill is very much associated with the
Wellcome Trust. What I find interesting about this is that
when we had the COVID-19 vaccine rollout, this same narrative was
rolled out again about speeding up the vaccines and not using
the normal 10 year process, but it was framed like this had
never happened before. But in fact, it had happened before
about seven, six years prior. And central in this was
GlaxoSmithKline, and the Wellcome Trust, and the National
Institutes of Health, several players who were obviously as
we've just talked about, instrumental in the COVID
response. You have any thoughts about that?
Yeah, yeah, I mean, Patrick Vallance did a lot of the public
face of a response in the UK. And he he was seen as kind of
disconnected, because, you know, GlaxoSmithKline aren't
necessarily making a vaccine. So you don't need it. They're kind
of impartial. They've made this big, pharmaceutical giant,
that's really you know, would happily break the law overnight.
This this impartial kind figure. But if you if you criticize him,
especially on Twitter, and the like, you'll find yourself
censored pretty quickly. I I've experienced that. The longest
time I've had on Twitter is first saying something about
Patrick parents. Now, there's a lot when you talk because you
started talking about Ebola. And there's a lot of crossover
between these characters in the UK. And the people who were
working on Ebola that were American. So like Pardis,
Sabeti, who worked as she got links with Farrar with Edward
Holmes, with other people like Debbie Sridhar and Andrew Rambo.
They're both from Edinburgh University, if I remember
correctly, and they were all quite heavily involved in the
Ebola crisis, I think that was a really important moment, when a
lot of the the big world order of medicine was starting to be
created to a level that they will be able to enact what
happened during COVID-19, you know, they didn't have the power
before. From all of my research, what I saw is, every time they
tried to spark some sort of pandemic here, or some sort of
pandemic, there's some fear mongering that they would, they
would hit a brick wall every time with people going, Yeah,
whatever, whatever, then people were old enough to remember, bad
bad vaccines of the past and, and all of the things of the
past and they're not, they're not going to get involved in
doing any of this. So they they've tried to push these
ideas of vaccines out, and it's never been successful. But now
people are really been primed for this. It's almost like oh,
we we've got to keep introducing these new things, all of the
time that everybody's going to take to get people used to the
idea of taking stuff. That's simply what it is. It's very
much like and when I talked about pardons for Beth use a
really interesting figure. She she was she studied both Harvard
and Oxford, two places where I ended up a lot in my research
when looking into this new world. She's a Rhodes Scholar as
well, you know, she's right up the cream of the crop. She's got
links with Elon Musk, and Eric Lander. These people are the
trans humanists. These people are the people who are trying to
create the agenda. That means that you're going to have to
keep having your body pumped full of something until that's
something is no longer medicine. It's something else and then
something else and then you were prying to say Okay, the next
one, we got this ill health so it a bit a bit of ill health or
this fear of a virus. Now Ebola is perfect for for making people
afraid. Because Ebola, the people's idea of Ebola is spread
terribly. Everybody dies, you're bleeding out your eyes and all
your orifices. You know, they really scared and that's why I
think they all came together around that and really started
to work on plants of how to make other illnesses seem as scary as
Ebola. Because Ebola had that special it was like, Yeah, well,
you had you had Anthony Fauci saying stuff like, well, we
can't we haven't had a lot of access with a universal flu
vaccine or any of the stuff because people aren't scared
enough of the flu or have respiratory illnesses or
seasonal respiratory illnesses, and basically implied that in
order to ensure the success of those type of vaccination
programs, which for the past two decades had been heavily funded
by, you know, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and
related organizations. Essentially, what needed to
happen is that people needed to become afraid of those diseases.
In order to spur Vax vaccination,
the only way you can make people afraid is is either you release
a virus from the lab where you see people die. Okay, that's one
way you make people afraid, or you lie to them. You know, in
this in this particular, when it comes down to viruses, either
one of two ways, very rarely is one in 100 years, should we get
something that's probably a pandemic, and that's based on
maps that, well, we've had a load since humans have started
getting the function research and started testing on their
people and started releasing viruses. So we've had loads of
you know, we've had,
and this is something that US military's done the Porton down
in the UK has done. You know, it's been a very extensive but
largely unseen series of operations over the past century
or so, regarding bio weaponry, and its use on unsuspecting
civilians, I mean, there's just an insane amount of examples of
that happening, that a lot of people don't know very much
about. And it's probably not surprising that they don't at
this point, considering, you know, how people have behaved
over the past several years. So anyway, you mentioned a lot
about how this seems to be leading to transhumanism and all
of that. So maybe now's a good time to get into something that
Jeremy Farrar created as apparently as a response to
COVID. So remember, he's, as I mentioned earlier, the World
Health Organization, the Syrian saying that Jeremy Farrar is
essentially one of their is the top guy for them, as it relates
to the COVID 19 outbreak, really, as it relates to the
science of the outbreak and the financing of the response. And
what he does through welcome. As you know, he's director of the
Wellcome Trust at this point, his part of the response at
Wellcome Trust is to create welcome leap. Welcome leap he
ostensibly envisioned with it, create would launch quote,
unconventional projects funded at scale. And basically, it was
a at least the way I wrote about it, it was an obvious attempt to
create a global version of DARPA. Why do I say it was DARPA
because he put former DARPA directors in charge of it. And
the people specifically the lady who put in charge of it is
Regina Dugan, who was director of DARPA and green lighted
DARPA's funding of the mRNA injections that have since
become more or less normalized over the COVID-19 crisis. And
then, after she left to DARPA, she went to Google and
subsequently to Facebook where she set up DARPA equivalent
DARPA style organizations for both of those companies. And
then she's headhunted from Facebook to run welcome leap
where she essentially is creating a DARPA equivalent for
the Wellcome Trust. Yeah, yeah,
I'm Jay Flatley as well, which is, I mean, he was
a gene sequencing guy. So pretty much,
he's really just flatly is really important to this,
because he's a head of alumina, and aluminum will make nearly
every single machine nearly every single machine that runs
PCR tests, that
genomic sequences, PCR tests are
massively important to if you wanted to falsify results, you
need to be the person who keeps the results. That's it.
Sure, but in addition to that, Jay flatly has an obsession,
essentially, with the genetic sequencing you from birth to
death, and having genomic sequencing be mandatory
throughout various stages of life. And what what most people
in this world these people were talking about, and how they
refer to it as precision medicine, which is really more
like Gene specific medicine. And yeah, he was, for example,
example speaking at a World Economic Forum panel, which
interestingly enough, he was speaking out alongside Matt
Hancock, who was then UK health secretary, and he was promoting
all the the ideas of normalizing the genomic sequencing of babies
and children trying to he claims this was about shifting
healthcare system from reactive to preventative. But you know,
if for people familiar with my work, there is this huge theme
of the national security state, the military and the
intelligence community's trying to basically create it, use the
precrime approach approach, but apply it to medicine. So, you
know, for people that are interested in my work on that
you can look through some of my past interviews related to
biosecurity and other things. But it's just very,
very wide. It's very telling that it was 2016, I think or
2017 were like flatly, his company said that they're going
to embark on an aggressive five year plan, you know, that
aggressive five year plan, this is where we're picking up speed
now to bring genomic out of the research labs and into doctors
offices. And I think this is this is one of the signs that we
are changing. Once upon a time we use a company like Illumina
to check all of these things, because they're too complicated
for a normal everyday doctor to do. But now what they want you
to do, what they want doctors to be in eventually, is to have
some form of like a CRISPR, technology, style technology
where they can do they can permit a plate and play around
with people's genetics safely in the doctor's office, or come for
a visit. Okay, let's play around with you. And your genetics. And
this is a, this is a step in what we're seeing is a step
towards a much more futuristic idea, and a really hard to grasp
idea of what transhumanism looks like,
right? Well, transhumanism, as I've noted a lot in my work is
essentially the new eugenics. So what combines this idea of of
putting machines in your body and sort of what we're gonna do,
again, head of welcome leap refers to is fixing what she
calls the mismatch between human the human body and machines. And
then you have this, the gene sequencing aspect of it, which
is being framed as medicine through things like CRISPR and
mRNA injections and DNA injections and all of this
stuff. So we changed our name to the golden Institute to honor
Francis Galton, the guy that invented eugenics. And so now
we're going to rebrand again, and call it a Delphi. But a
Delphi is the name of the neighborhood where the British
eugenics society used to meet so you know, I mean, it's like
they're running out of things to like, secretly, still agree with
the stuff. But
you can see that this whole medical dictatorship that we've
got over the world, it's all linked, it's all clubs,
societies, groups. And, you know, these are clubs, which are
very similar to things we would have seen in the old day, olden
days, you know, you're related to so and so. So you get in this
club, and this club rules, everything. You know, we're
seeing the the same patterns. And this is one of the things
that I discover from going in history so much with my my work
going through history, is that when I was talking about, you
know, doctors will eventually have a CRISPR technology while
the doctor's office won't change, it'll still be the same
old, boring looking doctor's office. But slowly, the
technology will change, and it will be exponentially changing.
Roughly less our technology goes, it kind of goes
exponential, and goes up, and up and up. And at the same time,
the walls don't change, the people don't change what the
people want doesn't change, or how the people feel doesn't
change. All they're doing this testing on you with new new toys
that they've got. And this is what all of these guys are
doing. They're in their clubs, they'll create their clubs and
societies. And they want to test out all their new gadgets and
gizmos on these people who do not matter to them. And that's
where we got to understand when we understand those people don't
matter. We don't matter those people, then maybe majority of
people on Earth can decide that these people don't matter to us,
and we can stop listening to them. Stop giving them the
ability to get away with with things scot free. They do it all
of the time. They can do what they like and they don't have
accountability. And that is what Jeremy Farrar has been created
into Jeremy Farrar and the Wellcome Trust has been created
into supposedly nonprofit entity that's outside government,
outside business, outside education. Just it just exists
on the side and brings people together well actually brings
companies together actually. It covers up massive fake. Like it
over exaggerates pandemics over exaggerate everything to get
these companies and pharmaceutical big
pharmaceutical brands, get them more business. That's what it's
all about. It's all guys in clubs, using their technologies
together to try and take over Were there parts of the world,
which in this case is medicine.
All right, so I want to get a little more into welcome like
really bit because we didn't really get to discuss what it
views as science worth funding and what it sees as quote,
unquote, innovation. And this is relevant because going back to
the food press release about Farrar becoming Chief Scientist,
it says, Dr. Farrar will oversee the science division bringing
together the best brains in science and innovation from
around the world deliver and develop high quality health
services. So what is Ferrara think of when he thinks of
innovation in science, while I would wager that his the
projects that welcome leap are an example of that. So I
mentioned earlier, we're going to do again, right is in charge
of this with her former deputy at DARPA, Ken Gabriel, I think
his name is and do you can previously, when she was at
Google and Facebook, she was making things like brain machine
interfaces, a digital tattoo where your that will be on your
body and unlock your smartphone, a pill that turns you into your
own authentication, token, smart clothing, augmented reality
stuff. I mean, this is the stuff that she's big on. And then her
deputy Ken Gabriel, is one of the leading DARPA guys for micro
electrical mechanical systems research, which is directly
related to a lot of the stuff that do again, is has been
interested in during her time at DARPA, and after that time, as
well. And I just want to get a little bit into some of the
programs that welcome leap funds. So I previously wrote
about this again in June 2021. Not that long after it was
created. And I think I was the first person to report on
welcome leak, because no one has really paid very much attention
to the Wellcome Trust over the past three years. And I really
hope with this appointment of Ferrara that begins to change.
And that changes very quickly, so people can realize what we're
dealing with here. So the first program I wrote about that
welcome leak was involved with is abbreviated as hoped standing
for human organs, physiology and engineering. It's basically
about growing organs and growing, living things, growing
animals, all sorts of stuff. And using that for a whole variety
of purposes, including to replace existing clinical
trials. So instead of doing, for example, safety trials on on
animals, or human beings, these people would grow organs, and
then just test it on the organ and assume that's how a human
body would respond to it, which is obviously a way to cut
corners. But we've definitely seen a lot of that over the past
three years.
They create corners, they create their own corners, so they don't
have to cut them.
Yeah, I guess. So. Another program was called delta tissue,
which was about predicting changes in states of human
tissues. And as again, a thing about precision medicine
promoting the use of DNA and RNA gene therapies.
And they make it sound wonderful. They call a tissue
Time Machine.
Yeah, they, they obviously had PR people work on it. But it's
all about getting like AI to predict disease in humans,
again, this sort of pre crime approach to disease and health,
right. So if you can be like, Well, we think you're gonna
predict a crime based on your social media history, sometime
in the next five to 10 years, and we should send you to
prison. Now, you know, you have to trust the algorithm a lot,
especially when the algorithms like well, you'll probably
develop cancer, you don't have cancer now, but you'll probably
develop it. So you should do all this crazy invasive stuff and
inject yourself with all of this crazy goo. And whatever. It's
the same. Well, I mean, mentality there.
The problem is, with all of this, all of this will succeed
if they continue to aim at the young, you know, well, let
me let me get there because there's two more programs. Well,
three, I want to just do a quick overview of before we discuss so
one of the other ones is called multichannel site site being
short for psychology there obviously. And this focus is to
develop non invasive technology to directly interrogate the
human brain state this can be a non invasive spinal tap
equivalent, not sure how you do that Wow. Behavioral or
biomarker probes of neural plasticity, single session
neural monitoring capabilities. So basically, you can read
between the lines there and see what this stuff is about. A lot
of it is aimed at developing wearables basically to read read
your mind for lack of a better term but also specifically
manipulate what they call the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal
axis. So you know a part of the endocrine system. So it this
particular system or access and the body is a negative and
positive feedback system but it regulates stress reactions,
immunity and also quite notably fertility in the human body,
worth pointing out, specifically, if you're familiar
with some of our past work on Wellcome Trust and eugenics
stuff, and then the most disturbing programs are focused
on little kids and babies. So the most disturbing welcome LEAD
program, to me, it's called the first 1000 days promoting
healthy brain networks. And essentially what this is about
per them are creating objective, scalable ways to assess a
child's cognitive health by monitoring the brain development
and function of infants and toddlers, allowing practitioners
to risk stratify children and predict responses to
intervention and developing brains. So basically, they want
to develop a model for how a brain should ideally look and
then they want to decide what children don't fit that model,
and then intervene to make children's brains look like that
model, right? This is very messed up this whole idea of
like pruning children's brains to make them all cognitively
equivalents of each other as a way of what they say, you know,
equalizing the playing field, but really, you could I think
it's pretty communism. Well, I think you're wrong. Right. Okay.
Well, I think you can see how this could be misused, right.
And basically, the way it aims to accomplish this is that it
wants children to be exposed to from the age I think of it's
either three or six months of age.
I know it's free. It's free and under, is what they say. Okay,
yeah, but it's stuff like exposing your child to wearable
sensors, wearable, EEG, eye tracking technology. I mean,
these are for babies. Yeah, I'm terrible sensors, have them
under constant surveillance.
Data, if you want constant data, which is scientific, their
scientific modeling relies on constant massive data, such a
large amount of data, and they tracking their eyes are tracking
kids eyes. I mean, what what are they doing that for? Well,
they'll be tracking everything, they'll be tracking their
temperature, they'll be tracking more than talking about
their goal here, because remember this with Ferraris,
chief scientist at the who, and if they get these powers that
they want the food that we're going to talk about in a little
bit, this could be this could become a, you know, become
reality. A The main goal of this program before 2030 is to have
80% of children, you know, exposed to this technology in
this screening process that involves wearables, and all of
this stuff, like 2030 80% of kids. Now, the guy that created
the organization doing this is the guy that's going to be the
chief scientist of the who and gonna decide
direction of policy all around because they can get the nations
or every nation around to sign up to doing this, right wherever
they want it whether the people want it or not, this is
democracy out the window.
Right. And what's particularly disturbing to me also, is that
after I wrote that article, I didn't think these people could
get any sicker. But not that long after I published that
article, they announced a new program called in utero, where
they essentially are applying the same methodology and have
the same goals. But instead of applying it to infants and
children under three years old, they are applying it to fetuses.
The program, as you might expect, is called in utero
measurement and modeling during gestational development. And
it's essentially, you know, mobile sensing technologies and
you know, surveilling how your baby's doing now, are they
looking after the health of children and babies? Or are they
trying to understand how to create children and babies
because the next the next stage of the transhuman,
of trying to grow them
and to make pregnancy licenses a thing? Well, if
you if you look at this first 1000 days program at welcome
leap, what they want to do, like I mentioned earlier is create a
model of the ideal child's brain and then have interventions
developed that bring as many children as possible in line
with that model. It's a homogenization aren't
believable, unbelievable idea how I can I know it's mind
boggling. One of the most important and amazing things
about having kids is watching them develop into this person
themselves, and not influencing that in any negative way trying
to be positivity. You're handing over again your child's health,
complete health and, and everyday function over to
someone who does not Hear about humans who proved who have
proven over and over again, they just don't care about humans.
Yet people seem, I believe lots of people will have their
children over.
Well, here's the thing as head of the world as the chief
scientist at the who, and if these powers that were again,
we're going to talk about soon are implemented. Someone like
Jeremy Farrar, who sees this type of stuff as innovation that
sees pruning child's brains by machine intelligence and having
AI shape, that kind of stuff for future generations. He sees that
as innovation, this is going to be the guy that setting policy
at the who, and if these amendments were passed, the who
will have teeth, ie it will have increased sovereignty, while
Nation members or member states of the WHO nation states have
reduced sovereignty in these matters. You are basically
giving Jeremy Farrar a crazy man a blank check to dictate what
you do not just with your own body, but what happens to your
children's bodies. So this is very significant stuff. And this
is why I think this podcast today is really important
because, I mean, most people think of Jeremy Farrar like you
were we were reading before this podcast in an article by I think
the brownstone Institute. They just refer and criticize Farrar
as a lockdown advocate. Yeah, yeah. And a lot more than that.
Yeah, he did everything. I mean, he, he Yeah, he advised
lockdowns, He also advised all of the financing and the
response and he was the central figure. Fauci witty with the
American and British people dealing is supposed to be at the
top, we're told to go and report to her. This is the guy who's
doing every ease. He's also the same guy who in 2020, is saying
that China is setting the new standard for outbreak response
and deserves all our facts. And they are the model for the
future. This is this is a guy who people really, he what I
find amazing about Ferraris is hubris, it seems to him he knows
that anybody who knows is, you know, knows anything about
medicine, knows what he's doing. Everybody knows, who knows. And
all of the rest of the people are gonna get injected. And he's
got a little smile on his face, a little Dupas delight, a little
grin, because he knows what he's doing. And every time I read an
article, and they listen to his quote, he seems like he's
detached from the reality of where he is. And when when I
read out that piece earlier, where he talks about all these
things I've never done before. I don't believe that. I just think
that yeah, they had to do that, because everybody was watching
them all of a sudden, I think that normally, they're acting in
these ways, without accountability, and doing things
underhand and dealing with things behind the scenes, and no
one's watching. So they don't have to have burner phones, and
they don't have to have clandestine meetings, their
meetings in normal meetings to us would be clandestine, if we
looked at them. And these are the people who are in charge
your children's have want to put things because this like, some
of the technology they're talking about is pumping things
into your body, your child's body, and your baby's body that
will go around all of their body and map out the insides so they
can read the insights what they look like to homogenize your
child. This is
a firm that has an effort to also the same technology will be
used to cognitively augment your child. But remember that these
are DARPA people that are developing this. And DARPA
people also frame a lot of their transhumanist endeavors framed
as healthcare in similar terms. So this is this could be used to
augment people. But if you also read enough of crap, DARPA,
people have said over the years, as I have and some other people
have, as well, you will know that they have also said that
really, all of these technologies are dual use,
anything that can augment can also do the opposite and can
degrade. Right? And basically be weaponized to that effect.
So how many how many experiments on the entire population of the
earth do you think they can do before they destroy the entire
population of the earth?
I really don't want to think about it because I just think
this stuff is so sick. And I mean, if someone like Ferrara
gets the ability to basically just unilaterally decide what
what people have to do to their bodies, you know, it's obviously
going to go well,
no, no, I can't understand how someone like him is allowed to
exist without any sort of accountability. is allowed is
not is not in jail. Basically, it's not been investigated and
found to have been a fraudster already. That gets gets in a
real world. In a real fair world. That would happen but we
don't have that. And we document exactly the sort of people who
run roughshod over civilized society. This is what this is
uncivilized. This is treating people like meatbags, who they
can test on, is uncivilized. This is not civilized society.
Right. So I think it's time we turn to turn to the stuff going
on at the World Health Organization right now. So, I
want to give credit, first and foremost to James Rogowski,
whose work I was not familiar with until relatively recently.
I'm not really familiar with him or his background,
unfortunately, but he seems to be the person raising the most
alarm about what is going on at the World Health Organization
right now. So from January 9, until the 13th. And just for
reference for those listening, we're recording this on on the
13th. This is the time during which the International Health
Regulations review committee are conducting face to face meetings
in Geneva, Switzerland, not that far from, you know, Davao,
Switzerland, where the World Economic Forum is hosting its
first in person annual meeting,
they are willing to mingle. So I suppose it won't be thinking
they can jump in and out of each other's
Yes, yes. So I'm very true. So anyway, this particular review
committee, what they are doing is to finalize the proposed
amendments to the International Health Regulations. You may
remember that not that long ago, there was an attempt to bring
about these internal and international health
regulations, the Amendments Act, but that it was struck down by a
vote of who member states most significantly, from a bloc of
African countries who said no props to them, but relatively
recently, as well. And we'll get into this in a second, the World
Health Organization and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
were part of a new Dark Winter style simulation called
catastrophic contagion about a horrible virus that specifically
attacks Africa, and specifically children in Africa, and how they
need the WHO to have all these unilateral powers in order for a
bunch of their kids not to die. That was basically the the
message of that simulation anyway, back to the World Health
Organization. So again, these meetings that have gone on this
week, no live stream, there'll be no public comment period.
They don't really care about anyone's opinion, I guess. They
just report only to the director didn't general Lord Pedro's
himself. And then ostensibly, this is going to be voted on and
2024. But because of the certain deadlines that have been set up,
Renu ski notes that it's very possible that they may instead
vote on this stuff much sooner than expected, as a way to sort
of preempt protest or criticism. Oh, and have it voted on the
World Health Assembly meeting in May of this year, they very well
could. So this is why it's very important to cover this.
Amazing, we're going to preempt the protesters by definitely
causing proof. Well,
they're saying they're going to do it in 2024. But if they have
enough time to do it now and then avoid people preparing that
oppose it, you know, not give them time to prepare, like
something they do.
Yeah. And it's those moments that make us like game like I
say, a civilized society or not. You can't you can't say you're
civilized, if you're not giving everybody an ability to have a
voice or build you to speak up against something. And none of
this if everybody knew the facts, none of this would have
happened. None of this would have been no, no one would have
COVID vaccine in them right now. No one, zero people on Earth.
And what's really interesting about what you're talking about
the Kentucky sale stuff, catastrophic contagion, they do
it on purpose. They've made it a tongue twister on purpose for
me. The catastrophic can agent simulations. Now. It's obvious,
and it's clear that Africa did not go with the COVID narrative.
It was the only place and oh, well guess what they've they've
not had a problem with it, have they?
But there were five. So COVID didn't really hit the African
continent, right the way it allegedly hit everywhere else.
But you did, oddly enough, have about five or six heads of state
all die in a very short timespan. And interestingly
enough, all heads of state that didn't want to do a lot of this
biosecurity stuff recommended by the fool and ostensibly by
Farrar, who was you know, even though he wasn't chief scientist
at the time, he was the according to the WHO themselves
the key guy on COVID science and financing of the response. I
think
that if we want to know where we're going to be in the future
and how we're going to be treated in the future by these
people, that We should watch Africa over the next two years,
because there is going to be some form of what we could call
or just simply vengeance wrought upon those people because they
didn't get into line when they needed to get into line. And a
lot of these people are I do not care about Africans, they do not
care about Africans that totally proved
the Wellcome Trust history in Africa. It'll be very clear. Who
cares about Africans? Same Same with the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation? Yeah. So anyway, I think it's important then, to
see exactly what powers the who is attempting to give itself and
what will be voted on either in this May, or if we want to
believe them. Next year, your God now? Yeah. Okay. So one of
the most talked about perhaps amendments is a change to the
following line. So the line originally read, the
implementation of these regulations shall be with full
respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms
of persons. That whole last line about dignity, human rights and
fundamental freedoms of person is gone now. It's been replaced.
So it's now reads, the implementation of these
regulations shall be based on the principles of equity,
inclusivity coherence, and in accordance with their common but
differentiated responsibilities of the states parties, taking
into consideration their social and economic development. So
don't forget the word differentiating into any type of
let's see, oh, contract?
No, no, but it's happening a lot. Now, I'm sure you've seen
it, you know, from Rishi Sunak, you know, statements as, as UK
Prime Minister saying stuff like, more because we're, you
know, a more economically developed country. So we have
to, you know, give all our money away to these countries and
these causes and this and this, because, you know, we have a
different level of responsibility than less
economically developed countries, even though he's
basically imploding the economy. Yeah,
yeah. But that's, I mean, I predicted exactly that back in
July is clear that Rishi Sunak was the guy who's gonna come in
and he's gonna start organizing for the banks to bank
Yeah, he's the guy wasn't voted and he was placed in quite
a discount. I mean, from from a point of a British person is
quite disgusting. And it's exactly the reason why people
like Jeremy Farrar get away with what they get away with is that
that's the power we've embarrassed direction.
So anyway, these changes, highlight, you know, dignity,
human rights and fundamental freedoms go out the window when
it comes to the implementation of these regulations. Yeah. So
chief scientist, Jeremy Farrar can be like, Well, I think these
things have to happen in order to respond to public health
emergency acts. And those responses do not have to respect
human rights, or fundamental freedoms or dignity of people.
Instead, it's about equity, ie treating all people the same. So
everyone's got to get the vaccine. Right. Yeah. So that's
basically what the equity and inclusivity part means coherence
just means that they're clearly communicating what you're being
forced to do. And then, of course, the differentiated
responsibilities. There'll be different standards for
developing and developed countries for certain things,
probably to do with financing. Okay, so the other important
changes are about the powers that the director general Lord
Tadros will receive. So in addition, say things like the
Director General on the basis of information received may
determine at any time to issue in intermediate public health
alerts. Immediately after the determination of a public health
emergency of international concern under Article 12. The
director general shall make an immediate assessment of
availability and affordability of required health products and
make recommendations including an allocation mechanism, the who
shall develop an allocation plan for health products, so as to
ensure equitable access to people of all state parties upon
request of the whose state party shall ensure the manufacturers
within their territory supply the requested quantity of health
products to the food or other state parties as directed by the
WHO in a timely manner, blah, blah, blah. And this directly
ties into another amendment made on on that same, that same group
of pages that says state parties recognize the World Health
Organization as the guidance and coordinating authority of
international public health response during public health
emergencies of international concern and undertake agree to
follow who's recommended nations in their international public
health response. Okay, so let's pause for a second and break
that down. So state parties member states of the WHO
national nation states recognize that who guides and coordinates
international public health response during public health
emergencies. And they have to follow they agree to follow the
World Health Organization's recommendations, whatever they
are, as it relates to that public health emergency. And
that public health emergency can be declared willy nilly by the
director, General. So Director General Tedros decides, I think
I'm going to declare a public health alert, and it's going to
be a public health emergency of international concern front row.
And then from that, states have to do whatever the WHO
recommends and who develops those recommendations? Well,
it's about to be Jeremy Farrar.
That all of these all of these, anything that gets implemented,
has to work. Yeah, it has to have a function that everybody
gets on board. So they scare people with another virus. What
do you think's gonna happen? Well, I think this is again, an
example of their hubris, the great hubris, they believe that
they've now found a way to convince everybody that they're
going to die, or they should pump the old if they don't get
pumped full of their products, their medical products, but
they've used up all of their chips over the pandemic, they've
used up every single chip, they have, they have to now convince
people again, before the pandemic Edelman PR, the right
hand guys, PR firm for well, 60 to 70% of the businesses around
the world. And of course, Richard Edelman being the right
hand man of Klaus Schwab. And being really closely linked with
the World Economic Forum, they were saying before the pandemic
that they did increase the amount of people who trusted in
the media, again, it gone down to minus 80%. And negative
rating minus apes and 80% of people didn't trust what was
going on in the mainstream media. And just before the
pandemic, they managed to increase that through all of
their tools of creating political crisis and creating
fake fake news all over the place, they managed to increase
that to about minus 60%. So only 60% of people found that the
trusted news, but that was more than the 80%. So that's better.
And now it's gone back down again, because people have been
lied to. And now, people all around are watching people fall
over, get Ill die. And you know, when this happened before, with
vaccines, when this has happened in the past, is meant that the
uptake of new vaccines has been really low, and that people do
not listen to medical authorities anymore for quite a
long period. Because if it happens in your generation,
you're not going to believe them all of a sudden, when they tell
you the next time, if they tell you in two weeks, oh, we got
another virus. We gotta go pump this vaccine quickly. So get
vaccines, it's not gonna be like the last time they had it. They
had drive their impotency. They got all of these mainstream
media characters, they used all of their chips. And now they
don't have any of those bargaining chips.
I don't know, because there's a reason why they're trying to get
these new powers. And I think it's so they don't have to
really worry, yes,
they can force it upon people. That's, that is one of my
points. Were like the fifth sixth booster is like a 5%
uptake compared to the 1% to the first. So you can see that's
what happens every time. Now it's a generational thing.
pandemics are so rare, and epidemics are so rare. And they
try and push this thing or these things on you so rarely, because
they can't do it very easily. People don't just instantly go,
I've just left that pandemic aren't going to trust you. Now,
you just cheated me obviously out of that, in that last one,
they're not going to do that they are going to say no, and
there's going to be resistance. So they have to do it by
implementing policies that dictate to the people what they
have to have inside them.
Right. So let's go back to the some of these amendments. So I
just want to point out too, that not only do they take all these
new powers for themselves, no need to worry about human rights
and fundamental freedoms anymore over at the World Health
Organization, because those things get in the way of public
health obviously. Um, so they're also setting up frameworks for
specific things and these are what they call health
certificates, and passenger locator forums. And essentially
this is really a framework for vaccine passports. So, passenger
locator forms it says documents containing information
concerning traveler destination should be produced in digital
form, ideally, with paper form as a residual option. So right
away, they're trying to eliminate what we saw in COVID.
There was no digital They're trying to make it all digital.
And we know that this doesn't work that all digital is, is
what they're gonna ask for. And there'll be no paper allowed.
Now, that's what I'm saying. The amendment makes it so that it's
essentially no paper allowed that it's has to be digital. So
this time around, there's not going to be a paper option, and
that it will be used for contact tracing. And that such documents
will be recognized and accepted by all whom member parties,
right. And then you have health certificates, which they say
health documents, maybe maybe producing digital or paper form,
subject to the approval of the requirements, blah, blah, blah,
about technical requirements and stuff. And how they can will be
protected against abuse and falsification. So you can't make
false vaccine passports anymore. And all of this stuff, there's
like, you know, creating international standards that
will be recognized and accepted
for granting passport. So eating globally, structures right
underneath, right,
so not all vaccine passports, this time around, we're digital
where they know, like in the US, it was like this little card
that was produced by HHS, that was like a physical card that
was written on by the person that gave the vaccine. In some
places, it was digital, like Chile, for example. I think in
the NHS, it was as well, but may have had a paper option. But you
know, essentially, this is trying to create an
international framework so that it's all digital, again, like
the passenger locator stuff. And you know, a lot of people have
been talking about for a long time that vaccine passports are
a segue to digital ID and you see that, again here. And it of
course, says a little bit more about health certificates. Where
it refers to specifically vaccine or some sort of
treatment, digital or paper certificates should be used.
It makes traveling almost impossible.
Well, that's the goal, you're not going to the idea is to
basically centralize and standardize these types of
documents. Next time there's a public health emergency of
international concern
is about do Neo. It's an old trick is creating so much
bureaucracy that you feel completely overwhelmed and when
you try and I mean, for I had a couple of experiences a few
experiences of traveling across the world through COVID. From
from the star COVID. And there was when you got to a point
where they wanted to digital something from you an airport
or, or whatever wanted something digital from you, there was no
way out because there was no paper alternatives. There's no
way to print the paper alternative. There's no way to
have it. You're just you're just sitting there like hoping Yeah,
I remember being in one line where there was this old lady,
she must have been a 660s. And they were refusing to let her on
because she can fill out this document that was required by
Chile, because she was just too old and no one would help her
fill out. So she was sitting on the floor just crying. He was
just walking past her. That's your that's your future, pay for
your flight. You don't you don't get your money back. You just
gonna sit on the floor of the airport and cry, you know, go in
anyway.
Yeah, it's obviously a bleak future. If this gets through.
Some of the other things I want to add really quick, is that
state parties are allowed to basically disclose your personal
data were essential for the purposes of assessing and
managing public health risks. Well, Peter Thiel and like all
that. Yeah, well, for people that don't know Peter Thiel is
Palantir has had a major role in managing the data in the NHS and
also HHS and the UK in the US, basically, all the COVID data
was, you know, aggregated and data managed by them. Anyway,
something that's also particularly relevant, that the
who plans to strengthen its capacities to counter
misinformation and disinformation at the global
level. That's why it's, like more censorship far away. And
this time, it'll be a lot worse than last time. So if you
thought it was bad last time, and if you think Elon Musk's
Twitter will save you from Jeremy, forever World Health
Organization, I would know I'd say it's, let's suppose this
stuff. Yeah. And then the last one, they expand the definition
of what constitutes a public health emergency of
international concern so that it can now include clusters of
severe acute pneumonia of unknown cause. So they can
declare this new global pandemic when they don't know what's
causing it.
Like they could be the vaccines that they gave Oh,
yeah, or antibody dependent enhancement. Yeah. And then also
clusters of other severe infections in which human to
human treatment transmission cannot be ruled out. So I don't
know. It seems like a recipe for no good Crazy stuff.
This way, I feel that they can only become more dystopian, they
can almost they'll have to do everything by diktat. There's no
way that you can keep going along this route. And people
will be on board. And putting someone is really interesting.
They put someone else who works for the organization, and they
put someone with so much hubris at the top of the organization,
Jeremy Farrar and these guys think then the government can
get any kickback that people aren't going to point at them
and say, look at the loads of things that you did. This is a
guy. Normally, if someone covers up a pandemic, be a virus being
released from the lab and causing a pandemic, normally,
you would expect that that person would go a little bit low
key afterwards and a little bit quiet. But Jeremy Farage,
Ferrara gets put on top slip at the time, Jeremy Farrar gets put
on top of the World Health Organization that it just seems
like they're they are what we would say balls out now with
what they're doing. They do not care, they do not have any fear.
They know that the future is going to be major resistance to
all of this. And it is only going to get quicker, it's going
to get more extreme. And for that they need the best man in
on in their world on top of that, and that is at the moment,
Jeremy for someone who's been brought up and trained by some
of the most influential I mean, I didn't speak about him enough
earlier. But really important Roy Anderson. And and of course,
Richard Sykes, two of the people who helped for our to this area,
well, they will once upon a time they would they would be
desperate to be in for our situation. And I have that youth
now to be able to do what for I was going to do because variety
is taking their ideas on further and that is dictating to people
what is wrong with them and making it up if they can't find
the evidence and forcing it upon everybody forcing drugs upon
everybody forcing therapeutics beyond everything, but more than
anything, forcing experimentation upon human
beings, including infants, on everybody. Yeah,
so let's recap them since we're, you know, coming up to the end
of the podcast. So essentially, Jeremy Farrar over his career
has worked for the Wellcome Trust an offshoot of the
organization that was responsible for AZT during the
HIV AIDS crisis, that killed lots of people and of course,
tarnished the welcome burrows welcome name. And then this
figure Richard Sykes sort of oversees the spin off of the
Wellcome Trust and GlaxoSmithKline and all of this,
but they sort of come from the same,
you also at the same time to just quickly put in their sights
also rearranges the entire way that all scientific papers are
accessed and produced and the database is stored on he
organized all of that in late 80s.
Fascinating, I think Robert Maxwell had a hand in some of
that shape, from scientific journals as well, actually not
kidding about them. That's real. So anyway, Jeremy Farrar
throughout the rest of career does things where he is sent by
the University of Oxford to different epidemics and
pandemics and some cases like the what you noted earlier, he
essentially goes against the flu and says, Oh, well, there
actually is a pandemic here. And it wasn't there. And fear
mongering was used by the US national security state to
benefit themselves. And of course, for our benefits. And a
lot of these people who seem to be wrong all the time, like Neil
Ferguson, who's models are always insanely, still employed.
He's not wrong. He's not wrong. He knows he's wrong through
something else. He's not around. Well, that's what I'm
saying these people are repeatedly wrong. But they're
kept there for a reason. And it's because them being wrong is
benefiting somebody. Right? So these are people who in other
words are willing to lie to further specific agenda with
that agenda being this biosecurity surveillance state
that leads us in this transhumanist era, right. And
that's essentially what Ferrars career shows, I would really
encourage people to look at your article Johnny called the
welcome five, we'll have links in the show notes, and also my
past reporting on unlimited hangout about welcome leap
specifically. So you can really see what this guy is capable of.
And I do just want to point out too, that among the top funders
to the World Health Organization, is the UK
Government and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Bill
and Melinda Gates Foundation, works very closely with the
Wellcome Trust loves a lot of stuff that they do. Right. And
of course, the Wellcome Trust is very much very much shapes A lot
of health policy with respect to the government of the United
Kingdom. So it's interesting that you have them being listed,
at least right now, as one of the Top funding governments of
the who lease on their website, they've really changed how they
break down their funding, but a lot of money from there,
specifically. So you know, maybe it's possible, that's how
Ferrari got this particular position. And, you know, the
people that are responsible for Ferraris rise, you know, through
Ferrara are gonna essentially be running global health policy in
a way that they've never been able to before. And what we're
seeing here is the emergence of basically medical fascism at the
global level, in a way, where nation states will lack the
sovereignty to say no to the
dictates, we've never seen anything like this before.
Yes. And if you're having a guy that's willing to, you know,
trying to get 80% of kids hooked up to like, a bunch of insane
invasive mind mapping technology to try and like trigger the
singularity, and like all of this other crazy stuff, and
create like a, you know, cognitively homogenous group of
humans and potentially through gene editing a lot of other
crazy stuff as well, which is also associated with welcome
leap. You know, it's a very disturbing scenario we have
before us. And of course, it's been clear to me for some time
that there's going to be some sort of crisis needed to force
people to agree to adopt a lot of this transhumanist
technology. It's no coincidence. I think that a lot of this
transhumanist technology, for several years has been framed as
healthcare, one of the past podcasts we did, Johnny was
actually titled about, you know, reframing eugenics, as
healthcare. And that's essentially what we have going
on. Here still, but there has to be some sort of situation
created where people are forced to adopt technology, invasive
technology, on or in their bodies, they otherwise would
not. And it seems like what we have before us are the is
essentially the foundation for that type of event to take
place. And I think people really need to be very cognizant of
that, and consider what you will do to oppose this, because it's
very, you know, I think essentially, you know, if you're
in the place, a place like the US, you know, resistance is not
going to come from the federal government, the best you're
probably going to be able to do is, you know, affect something
at the local or state level, where a state legislature or
some sort of local council says that, you know, World Health
Organization dictates, you know, can't be unilaterally imposed on
your community or your state without, you know, some sort of
debate or something, well, there's
got to be some form of effort to stop globalist agendas and
policies being introduced on any local level. And there needs to
be some rethinking of how we hold our politicians and our
representatives accountable, because it's not working.
Well, obviously, it's not working. But I think the
response is obviously going to be something that's
decentralized. If you make, you know, one central entity that
gets any traction, they're going to focus all their attention on
that and destroy it, but numerous decentralized efforts
to do stuff locally, I think is going to be a lot harder for
them to tack on. I think, you know, based on what I've seen
over the past several years, that seems to be the most, you
know, effective way out of it, the more resilient you can make
your community to this stuff, whatever that means for you, you
know, is where this ultimately needs to go. I know that you
would like to see, you know, French Revolution style
guillotine stuff or whatever. But, you know, it may not
necessarily be that way sooner rather than later. You know,
what I,
what I really want to see is people come to this and some
people think about things and people think about where we go
and so so, you know, I though I do joke about the return of the
galleys and guillotines. I do think there's, there's there is
a point where people will break and say no more. And so that
will happen. Yeah, if they keep pushing, the people don't just
keep accepting it, it gets less and less people. And their
agenda is really focused and really hardcore, and is really
invasive. And some of the people who are involved in it are
really powerful people. And there's people who are getting
dirty with their associations as well. So one thing I'll just say
near the end of this is that in them the welcome five article. I
research five people who connected with the Wellcome
Trust in the past, including Jeremy for warrior, Roy
Anderson, Neil Ferguson, and Richard Sykes, and I look at a
few others too. But what you find connects nearly all of
these people is their memberships of certain societies
and certain organizations in their case, it is the Royal
Society in the UK, which was made up to be a place where lots
of scientists and to medical people and come together and
have their little club. But really, it's a roundtable group
where they can separate actions from the politicians and the
politicians go there and ask the guys there who are members of
the Royal Society to go and organize all of these people to
do these things. So it's a way that breaks out if we can see if
we can expose those parts as important conduit. So as
important cogs that make this the stuff work without
accountability for these bad actors, then we can bring the
whole thing that we can bring the whole thing down because
their structure relies on really significant and important
conduits like like, funding conduit, for the CIA for
universities and stuff. You take away that conduit, you stop the
program running. When Kissinger's international
seminar was running soon as it was exposed, Kissinger's
international seminar stopped.
Yeah, but that that depended on journalists like exposing it.
Yeah, they're, they're planning to censor a lot more. So I think
people should get a lot wiser about media consumption, do not
rely on social media, for your news, invest in something like
an RSS feed, or some sort of other means of accessing the
sites you like. And in sort of aggregating that information. On
big tech,
yeah, communicate with a range of people with all different
views and get loads of different ideas and a load of different
forms of evidence and make up your own mind based on
everything, not based on only what certain people, if you will
ever get told in life, certain people know better than the rest
of you, you, then those certain people are not to be trusted.
That's a rule you can put over life. If you have someone who
says no, we know about this, and you shouldn't listen to anyone
else. As soon as they say you shouldn't listen to anyone else.
They're liars.
So the last point I want to bring up here too, is that I do
not think that all of this would be happening right now. The
World Health Organization power grab this catastrophic contagion
simulation, looking at the area era, the main continent in the
world that didn't play ball with the COVID stuff. And Jeremy
Ferrars appointment, all of this, to me suggests that what
we saw over the past three years, they plan to do again,
and they plan to have learned from their mistakes, and they
plan to have the big guns out this time. Yeah, okay, I can
safely assume that that will not happen until after these
amendments are approved. But after that point, and once
Farrar is in this position, watch these people like hawks,
there is going to be something they are going to do this again.
Because otherwise they are not going to get to all of the
different you know, go remember this is all about remaking the
world. This is not just about remaking health policy that is a
key part of this, because a lot of this technology needed to run
the smart grid and all of this stuff they are forcing through
and into our world and into you through health policy. That's
how they're getting a foot in the door. But this is about
remaking every aspect of our society. That's what agenda 2030
is all about. And one of those sustainable development goals
that composed 2030 Number three is about health care, but this
is this is the way that it's being it's, you know, if you let
them it's game over,
how do you cause a great reset of any type of industry or any
type of economy, you could see what they're doing now they're
gonna have to crash it they're gonna have to make it feel as
unmanageable and so then they offer you a new system and
medical may be the same. They will push this until
we're already talking about it. Yeah, I headline I saw a couple
days ago at preparing for the imminent collapse of the US
healthcare system. I've been saying hey, for a long time the
NHS is near collapse. Yeah. And Chilean media, they talk about
oh, hotels are overstretch they
were your saviors be way your saviors because in the same club
in that Royal Society alongside Farrar and Sykes and people and
these manipulators behind the scenes are also a rare American
is allowed in in this case is only a couple Bill Bryson's in
there but also Elon Musk is a member of the Royal Society
understand that they all flock together and they will give you
your saviors as they give you
a quick talking about you know how I think Ferrara is gonna in
this position as chief scientist who was going to try and force
you know, transhumanist tech on people. They also need people
that oppose the food and you know, their policies and this
power grabs they need to sell that same tech to them but from
a different angle. Right. And I would argue that someone like
Elon Musk has been very much primed and set up for this
personal Savior role over a series of years and I talked
about this on a recent panel with with Derek bros. James
Corbett Ryan Christian and Jason Burma's. You know, that's
essentially what's happened here and you have him you know,
selling transhumanist tucked under the same metrics that the
same narrative that is used to promote them by people like
we're going to do get in the head of welcome leap and by
DARPA and stuff. So healthcare justification, how does Elon
Musk justify neuro link? Oh, it's gonna help the blind see,
and the Paralyzed walk. And that's how he justifies about
commercializing it, and everyone's gonna have one, you
don't want to be left behind when everyone's gotten the chip
in the brain and the upgrade under there. So you know, I
really see that they're trying to sell this from multiple
angles. And ultimately, it comes down to how many people are
going to be willing to sacrifice their convenience and their
comfort, to say no to this agenda and this technology, it
stops, do not let them in, do this stuff to you and your
children. Full stop. Yeah. Essentially the way out if you
don't know how to organize or do anything in your local
community, that's the red line.
Agreed, but they will make a necessity. Now, this time you
try to Yeah, well, this time they released a fairly minor, or
released or at least released from a lab was a minor disease.
In the future, these guys could release something really
catastrophic, and spread it around, as they, as they see fit
to cause as much fear. And all of these, I told you, so from
these people who are in control, now you've got to listen to us.
And that's what I see in the future.
Well, I think, you know, my advice would be, you know, a lot
of this they can't accomplish without having a lot of people
really scared and afraid. So fear should be your enemy. And
you should also, again, keep your kids and yourselves away
from all this experimental crap, because a lot of it comes under
the transhumanist umbrella at the end of the day. And if you
don't want that transhumanist agenda 2030 future for you and
your family and your community. And more broadly speaking the
world this is this is the time to oppose it the time is now. So
again, I would encourage everyone to follow up a lot on
on what the who is doing with these amendments, who Jeremy
Farrar is, please consider looking into the Wellcome Trust
more if you haven't already. Because as you know, Johnny and
I have mentioned before, there is a lack of reporting by
independent media on the Wellcome Trust, and on Jeremy
Farrar, and he is poised to have a lot of power if these
amendments are rammed through which seems increasingly likely,
yeah. So please, I would urge those watching. If you haven't
looked at or listening, if you haven't before, definitely look
at the show notes on this one, take the time to read it and
understand what we're facing here. Because this is a global
biosecurity issue. If you did not like the past three years,
it's time to get prepared and understand who these people are,
what they have done and what they are likely to do, again,
and how to prepare yourself and your family. Anything else you'd
like to add? Final thoughts, John?
No, no, I would say that. Yeah, I mean, that's well said, you,
we, those, I don't want to limit to only those who have children,
those who have loved ones, those who care about anybody in the
world. I mean, I want to see my children get by without being
compromised. And that's what I feel the modern medical system,
and these actors do to our children and to us, it
compromises the will need to be hooked up to medicines for the
rest of our life. And we all know it, we all know that. So
don't just don't fall for
it. They see you as a data set as a biological computer. And
that's how they that's how they view everyone that's not in
their little club, right? And they will treat you like that as
expendable and you can be experimented on. That's why you
see in the the WHO regulations, dignity, human rights,
fundamental freedoms, no, it's about treating everyone the
same. And everyone is a slave as a serf to these guys at the top.
And they're going to do everything in their power to
make itself and it's obviously incumbent on all of us to oppose
them. Well, alright, John, thanks for giving me a
significant portion of your time today. Thanks for coming back on
the podcast. Where can people follow your work and support you
and what do you have coming up?
Well, I you can find me at Johnnyvedmore.com. Of course,
I'm writing on unlimited Hangout. And I'm also on
fungimonkey.com, which is a lot of my media stuff. There's loads
of interesting articles coming up. Just released a piece on the
German Marshall Fund, which is a real interest in organization
that kind of the piece kind of links up the Henry Kissinger's
international seminar and, and the Young Global Leaders program
in the way of leadership courses that come out of especially
Harvard. I got an Just stuff coming up is really interesting.
Some some things I'm working on at the moment are some of the
most interesting things I've ever worked probably in my life.
At times as they get more dystopian get more interesting
for us as journalists. That's an unfortunate byproduct
versus our workload.
Yeah. So so I just encourage people, you know, go out and
read, don't only read the one thing, read everything. Never
trust anybody who tells you not to look in a certain place and
only to look at where they go. We want to encourage people to
look at everything up your own mind. And thanks for having me
on.
Yeah, absolutely. So I think this is a very important timely
episode. So I would encourage those listening, if you thought
this information was important, please share it around. Because
we definitely have algorithms and censorship working against
us. And as we just talked about earlier today, next time, the
who declares a public health emergency of international
concern, that censorship, we'll probably get a lot worse than it
was last time. So try and prepare yourself for that if
you're interested in things like RSS feeds or how to follow this
podcast or unlimited hangout articles by that means. We have
info about that on the website. We can put that in the show
notes as well. A big thank you as always to supporters of
unlimited hangout and people that subscribe to this podcast.
You keep my articles and Johnny's articles coming as they
do and of course, this podcast up and running as well. And we
thank you so much for that. And yeah, that's it for now, and
we'll catch you on the next episode. Thanks.